🔗 Share this article

Worldwide, nations are investing massive amounts into the concept of “sovereign AI” – developing their own artificial intelligence technologies. Starting with the city-state of Singapore to the nation of Malaysia and Switzerland, countries are competing to develop AI that grasps native tongues and local customs.

The Worldwide AI Battle

This initiative is an element in a wider worldwide competition dominated by major corporations from the US and China. While firms like OpenAI and Meta allocate massive resources, mid-sized nations are also taking sovereign bets in the artificial intelligence domain.

However with such tremendous amounts in play, can smaller states secure notable gains? As stated by an expert from a well-known research institute, Except if you’re a rich government or a big firm, it’s quite a burden to build an LLM from the ground up.”

National Security Considerations

A lot of states are reluctant to use external AI systems. Across India, for example, American-made AI tools have occasionally proven inadequate. One instance involved an AI assistant employed to educate students in a distant area – it spoke in English with a thick American accent that was difficult to follow for native users.

Additionally there’s the national security aspect. For India’s military authorities, relying on certain external AI tools is viewed inadmissible. According to a developer commented, “It could have some arbitrary data source that could claim that, such as, Ladakh is separate from India … Utilizing that particular model in a defence setup is a big no-no.”

He further stated, “I have spoken to individuals who are in defence. They want to use AI, but, forget about particular tools, they prefer not to rely on US technologies because data may be transferred outside the country, and that is completely unacceptable with them.”

Domestic Projects

As a result, some states are supporting local initiatives. An example such project is in progress in the Indian market, in which a company is working to create a domestic LLM with state funding. This initiative has dedicated roughly a substantial sum to artificial intelligence advancement.

The developer imagines a model that is significantly smaller than premier tools from American and Asian corporations. He explains that the country will have to offset the resource shortfall with talent. Located in India, we don’t have the advantage of pouring billions of dollars into it,” he says. “How do we compete with say the hundreds of billions that the United States is pumping in? I think that is where the key skills and the strategic thinking plays a role.”

Local Priority

Across Singapore, a government initiative is supporting language models developed in south-east Asia’s regional languages. These particular languages – such as Malay, the Thai language, the Lao language, Bahasa Indonesia, Khmer and additional ones – are often poorly represented in Western-developed LLMs.

I wish the experts who are creating these national AI systems were informed of how rapidly and the speed at which the frontier is advancing.

A senior director engaged in the program notes that these systems are intended to enhance more extensive AI, rather than substituting them. Platforms such as ChatGPT and Gemini, he states, frequently find it challenging to handle local dialects and cultural aspects – interacting in awkward the Khmer language, as an example, or proposing meat-containing recipes to Malay individuals.

Building local-language LLMs allows local governments to include local context – and at least be “knowledgeable adopters” of a advanced tool built elsewhere.

He further explains, I am prudent with the concept sovereign. I think what we’re attempting to express is we want to be more adequately included and we aim to grasp the features” of AI platforms.

International Collaboration

Regarding countries seeking to carve out a role in an escalating global market, there’s a different approach: team up. Researchers affiliated with a respected institution have suggested a government-backed AI initiative distributed among a alliance of developing states.

They call the project “Airbus for AI”, modeled after Europe’s successful strategy to build a rival to a major aerospace firm in the mid-20th century. Their proposal would entail the establishment of a state-backed AI entity that would pool the assets of various states’ AI projects – for example the UK, Spain, Canada, the Federal Republic of Germany, Japan, Singapore, South Korea, France, Switzerland and Sweden – to create a competitive rival to the US and Chinese giants.

The primary researcher of a study outlining the initiative states that the proposal has gained the attention of AI officials of at least several states to date, along with multiple national AI firms. Although it is now centered on “developing countries”, developing countries – the nation of Mongolia and Rwanda among them – have also expressed interest.

He elaborates, “Nowadays, I think it’s simply reality there’s less trust in the promises of this current American government. People are asking such as, can I still depend on such systems? What if they choose to